Targeted review
One specific question, one component, one version. To verify a critical point without opening up the whole product.
- Targeted code review
- Directed test scenarios
- Technical note and recommendations
For teams that ship fast
03 / Wallet audit
A wallet can be elegant, fast and perfectly audited — and then lose funds through an opaque approval, a predictable random number generator, uncontrolled radio emissions or an implant in the supply chain. We audit the complete chain, from the chip to recovery after an incident.
Scope
Eight surfaces of analysis, tailored to each product and each level of risk.
Source of randomness, derivation, BIP-32/39 paths, account management and recovery phrases.
Secure elements, software vaults, offline backups, secret sharing and metadata exposure.
Decoding, EIP-712, blind signing, simulation, look-alike addresses and the readability of amounts.
Unlimited allowances, session keys, modular smart accounts, delegated signers and persistent permissions.
Libraries, reproducible builds, distribution channels, browser extensions and update compromise.
Recovery procedures, social recovery, continuity plans and partial-compromise scenarios.
Entropy, firmware RNG, seed generation, signing nonces and derivation. Statistical testing and reproduction.
LTE/eSIM, Bluetooth, electromagnetic emissions, reception of reference and time-signal stations, physical inspection and the search for supply-chain implants.
Absolute rule: we never need a private key, a recovery phrase or access to funds. Radio analysis is passive and performed on devices we own or with written authorisation: no interception of third-party communications, no jamming. Where a test requires it, it is run by your teams, in your environment, under your control.
Engagement formats
Every engagement is covered by a letter of engagement and a quotation drawn up after scoping. Missions will open after the declaration with the préfecture.
One specific question, one component, one version. To verify a critical point without opening up the whole product.
For teams that ship fast
From threat model to final report, with review of the code, the signing flows and the user experience.
For a wallet before release
Design before you code. We test the choices made for custody, recovery and delegation.
For new products and treasuries
Two surfaces that software reviews cannot see: the quality of randomness and what the device emits.
For hardware wallets and their integrators
Process
An audit is not a PDF. It is an adversarial, documented and tracked process.
Objectives, scope, versions, constraints and expectations. We decline any scope we cannot cover.
Letter of engagement, deliverables, schedule, rules of engagement and confidentiality terms.
Code review, testing, dynamic analysis and interviews with the product and security teams.
Report, severities, evidence, prioritised recommendations and a restitution meeting.
Verification of fixes, exchanges with the vendor and coordinated disclosure where necessary.
Deliverables
Every finding is tied to a version, a reproduction scenario and a recommendation. The report distinguishes what is exploitable from what amounts to hardening.
Executive summary, scope, method and limits of the analysis.
CVSS v4.0 scoring, scenarios, evidence and exploitation conditions.
Steps and artefacts allowing your teams to verify each finding.
Prioritised recommendations, with effort and residual risk.
Scope request
A 30-minute conversation is often enough to clarify the scope, the priority risks and whether an engagement makes sense. No commitment at this stage.
Would you rather write to us directly?
contact@frblockchain.icu
This form sends no data to a server: it opens your email client with a pre-filled message, which you review before sending.
Frequently asked questions
The price depends on the scope, the number of components, the versions and the level of proof expected. We will provide a quotation after scoping, never before. Pricing and the business model will be specified once the association is constituted.
Yes. The letter of engagement provides for the confidentiality of exchanges, artefacts and the report. Critical findings may be shared with the parties concerned under embargo. Any publication requires written agreement, except where legally required.
We inform you immediately through a dedicated channel, before delivery of the report if necessary. We propose an emergency plan, help with remediation and coordinate disclosure. No publication takes place before users can be protected.
Research on public software can be carried out within a strict legal and ethical framework. A formal audit — with access to the code, the teams and the test environments — requires the vendor’s authorisation. We never circumvent a protection measure.
Requests are considered case by case. We give priority to exposed individuals (journalists, activists, entrepreneurs, small organisations) and to high-risk situations. We never promise to recover lost or stolen funds.
Yes, on a device you own or with the owner’s written authorisation. We do not intercept third-party communications, jam signals or test a device without consent. Findings are reproduced, documented and disclosed in a coordinated way.
The method combines passive listening in a shielded enclosure, electromagnetic probes, an SDR receiver and comparison with reference devices. A signal is only retained after reproduction and firmware analysis. We distinguish a real leak from a measurement artefact.